Organic Salmon: Fact or Fiction?

closeup of salmon and garnish on white plate

As health coaches you know what the word organic means… you gravitate towards it, you seek it out. When reading a menu or shopping at the grocery store, it’s one of the words that just jumps out at you (along with raw, gluten-free, dairy-free, fermented, etc!). You’re health conscious, you’re a label reader, and you teach your clients to be label readers (and menu readers) too.

What and how much we know about food is what sets us apart from other people – our hunger for information about all things healthy and healing is what drove us towards being health coaches. But would you be able to spot an erroneous use of the word organic in the image above? Most people wouldn’t – health coach or otherwise.

Last weekend I went out to dinner with a friend and fellow health coach to a restaurant on the Upper West Side of Manhattan. It’s new, modern and is focused on clean, natural foods. Their meats are pasture raised, and antibiotic free, and their grains and vegetables are certified organic. Their philosophy is “to serve healthy, carefully sourced and delicious food.”

In perusing the menu, the words “ROASTED ORGANIC SALMON” jumped out at me. Huh? I know vegetables, fruits, grains, and even meats can be organically raised, and certified organic by the USDA, but fish? Not so much.

The waitress didn’t seem to understand when I asked her to clarify what the menu meant by “organic salmon” – she uttered the words “healthier” and “Whole Foods”, but was a little lost beyond that. The manager came out and nervously explained that they source organic salmon from a boutique seafood purveyor based out of NY who sells them Organic Scottish Salmon, and he even brought out the purchase order to show me that’s what they were buying.

By all appearances, yeah, they were buying and serving organic salmon. Story over, right? Nope, not so fast.

Here’s the deal: In the United States, the USDA’s National Organic Standards Board (NOSB) is the agency that regulates the USDA Organic Seal and develops the standards for what’s permitted in organic practices (they don’t however regulate the use of the word organic – just the seal itself). Back in 2000 when these standards were developed, they took into consideration agriculture (food crops) and land animals (cows, chickens, pigs, etc), but they didn’t set any standards for aquaculture (fish).

Fast forward a few years later, we see farmed salmon and other species establishing itself around the world as a consistent source of seafood that among other things markets itself as a “sustainable” seafood that takes the pressure of overfishing off the ocean stocks.

The NOSB determined that it would be impossible to categorize wild-caught seafood as organic, as there is no way to enact any sort of standards – wild species will migrate through rivers and oceans, and there’s no control over what kinds of pollutants, if any, they will be swimming through, and there’s no way to control what these wild fish are eating. It is the establishment of standards that allows for the uniformity of production that can earn an “organic” label. No ability to set standards = no possible way to define as organic.

“Organic” wild-caught seafood is an impossibility and doesn’t exist.

A closed system, like a farm, is the only way to have standards in place to follow. Around 2004/2005 an attempt was made to establish a set of guidelines for farmed organic aquaculture, that mirrored many of the practices that are used for land animals, like cows and chickens. There were too many loopholes and too many upset people who forced the NOSB back to the drawing board, where they still sit. At the moment, there is NO USDA CERTIFICATION for farmed organic seafood. It does’t exist (but they’re working on it!).

It does however exist in other countries, and this is how it possible for you to see the words “organic salmon” on a menu and it’s technically accurate, although with major, major caveats. In the UK, mainly Scotland and Ireland, where seafood farming has been practiced for a while now, more and more farms are attempting to convert to organic standards, set by European regulatory agencies. Canada released it’s own set of standards for “organic seafood” earlier this year – both the Canadian and European standards have come under heavy attack from environmentalists and supporters of the organic foods movement, and with good reason.

So what’s wrong with farmed seafood?

Farmed seafood is notorious for being a major pollutant to aquatic environments and to the bodies of the fish themselves. Studies have shown that farmed salmon (although other species have this problem as well) have much higher levels of PCB’s and dioxins than wild-caught fish and that the crowded conditions in which they are raised necessitates the use of antibiotics and pesticides to prevent disease from spreading and infestations of things like sea lice. They also have a much higher fat content that their wild caught counterparts, which from an Omega-3 standpoint might sound good, actually isn’t, as this fat can often serve as a reservoir for fat soluble toxins.
The waste that these penned up fish produce is an environmentalists nightmare, and the conditions are anything but ethical or healthy. This isn’t very different from the factory farming model of cattle or chicken, which we all work to stay away from, and encourage our clients to stay away from. Shouldn’t “factory farming” of seafood be the same? (hint: yes.)

But if these farmers are operating “organically” isn’t that better? Possibly, but likely not very much. Many of these so called organic farmed fish operations do use much lower stocking densities (how many fish per pen) than conventional operations, likely reducing (but not eliminating) the need for antibiotics and pesticides, and they’re able to control the quality of the feed the fish are getting – these are good things, but I don’t think they’re good enough, and they certainly, in my opinion, don’t live up to what most of us have come to understand about organic. These international organic standards also seem to allow a certain amount of pesticide and/or antibiotic use at certain stages of the fish’s life – something that continues to irritate those looking for strict organic standards.
In looking at a menu that reads “organic salmon”, I know what they’re trying to tell me, what they’re trying to express, but for me, this raises more eyebrows than had the menu just said “salmon”. To me, Organic Farmed Seafood is an oxymoron. Farmed seafood is full of pollutants, is devastating to the environment, and produces weak, pale, and tasteless fish (did you know that farmed salmon are fed a synthetic, petroleum based compound called astaxanthin to give their flesh a bright pink color? If you see “color added” on a label, this is what they are referring to. gross.) I consider Organic Farmed Seafood an affront to those who really stand by the purity of the organic movement, and all the it entails.

So what did I tell the manager of this restaurant?

I was polite and reminded him that people eat at his restaurant likely because they’re looking for a healthier option, and that for most people, the word ‘organic’ is loaded with associations and expectations, and that using it to refer to a piece of fish that is farm raised (and by default, very likely full of pollutants and toxins) is a little misleading. Since most people don’t understand the nuances of organic labeling, especially as it refers to seafood, it’s better to be clear and just call it out for what it is: Farm Raised. Thankfully he was receptive and appreciative (at least to my face!) for my explaining to him something he didn’t know about, and told me that he’s pass on the information to the owner.

Will they change the menu? Doubtful, but I certainly hope they will. As more and more people become savvy shoppers and eaters, and learn to question what’s really behind a label, or certification, the better off we’ll be.

What choice will you make next time you see “Organic Salmon” on a menu??

8 thoughts on “Organic Salmon: Fact or Fiction?”

  1. Thank you Lara for this insightful article. Though I’m aware of the nuances of this touching matter regarding salmon, I appreciate the details and historical background. Even eating wild salmon is iffy with so many pollutants in our oceans. Do you eat wild salmon and how safe do you really think it is?

    You have provided wonderful info on toxicities inside and outside the home that i have shared with my family and clients. I am so grateful …keep up the beautiful work!!!

    Be well,

    Jen Dorf
    Morendorfins Food & Wellness Coaching

    1. Hi Jen!

      I was a strict vegan for over 18 years so didn’t eat any seafood for that entire time. Since about 2008, I’ve been supplementing with fish oil, but only recently (in the past few months actually) started eating fish again, and very sporadically. The ONLY fish I’ll eat is wild Alaskan salmon. My father and brother take a fishing trip up to Alaska every summer for the annual salmon run and catch enough to last through til next summer – I’m lucky enough that I can mooch off their catch!

      I think that the benefits of eating wild caught, domestic seafood likely outweigh the risks that might be present – not daily, but maybe a few times a week. The same can’t be said for farmed fish though, or large ocean species of fish, or even imported fish – I wouldn’t touch those with a ten foot pole! (was that a fishing pun??)

  2. Hi Lara,

    Thanks for that interesting article. I never knew much about “Organic Salmon” and to be honest, whenever I had bought smoked salmon in the stores I had gone for Organic versions even though I didn’t really know what that meant! I am from the UK and have bought this smoked salmon which is from Scottish waters and states that it is farm-raised. I’m guessing that this is not all that good either….hmm…I guess I will quit the fish then! Or, I may just eat it occasionally whether stated organic or not!


    1. Hi Isabel,

      Yeah, the Scottish farmed seafood is notoriously not so good. The Scottish and Norwegians have been fouling up ocean waters around the world with farmed fish operations. Thumbs down all the way. What’s annoying is that so many menu’s will just say “Scottish Salmon” which to the average person comes of sounding fancy and unique, and somehow healthier. They just happened to leave out the word “FARMED Scottish Salmon”

      The best thing to eat is wild caught, domestic (even in the UK), small species fish (mackerel, sardines, salmon, – not tuna, swordfish, etc.)


  3. In had a similar situation at Seasons 52. They list Organic Salmon on the menu. They say that by Organic they mean wild. I told the manager there is no such thing as Organic Salmon and if it is indeed wild, they should say wild. They charge a lot more for the “organic” than they do the rregular.

    1. Arlene – TOTALLY – that’s exactly what this place did. It’s one thing if it’s out of ignorance, but if they’re misleading people to think one thing when they’re selling something else at an inflated price, then that’s just lame!

  4. Hi Lara!

    Thanks for the very informative article. I haven’t yet encountered any ‘Organic’ seafood labeling and am aware that presently there are no USDA organic standards for it, however, there were bits of detail and history that I wasn’t clued in to. Thanks for filling in the gaps!

    What do you think of the Seafood Watch organization ( Do you find that they’re accurate and current with their recommendations and info? I use their app when I’m out shopping.

    1. Chandra,

      There are a few guides out there like Seafood Watch, most notably the Blue Ocean Institute’s Fish Guide, but these two base the majority of their greenlight/redlight ratings on sustainability, ecological, and ethical markers. There is some overlap with consideration regarding pollutants and mercury levels, but not across the board.

      For example, the Marine Stewardship Council, one of the more respected third party certifying agencies for sustainably caught fish, will grant their seal to pole caught sword fish, despite the fact that swordfish have some of the highest levels of mercury of any fish in the oceans – rendering it, in my opinion, too potentially harmful to eat ever, sustainable or not.

      The Environmental Defense Fund considers more heavily the chemical/metals build up in fish species in their rating guide – check theirs out at:

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top

Join My Newsletter

Stay in the loop with current news about environemtnal toxins, safer product recommendations, and more!
We’ll never share your information, or spam you, ever!

*Free Environmental Health Intake Questions*

Elevate your practice with better questions! Identify hidden toxic exposures with our customizable intake form and get ready for transformative client health outcomes.